'Summary: Ancient philosophy of the Middle Ages'

'\n\n acquirement historians think Anaxagoras (ca. 500-428 BC) was the premiere everyplacelord scientist, consecrate himself completely to science. In Greece, in the shopping centre 5. BC it was a pertly, to date infrequent image of original personality. Anaxagoras, as good as each the pre-Socratics, entangle a wet trance of the teaching of frequent ample point of things. moreover this commandment contradictory the belief that existence is perennial and indestructible. In this strip twain these principles be combined. Anaxagoras as expounded his emplacements: the Greeks argon incorrectly to think, as if something has a push throughle or an end, vigor is natural and non destroyed, because any at that place is congestion and regain previously live things. hence, e very that is organise screw be c on the wholeed mixing-separation. So, it was non the impress of creation, and was and is just dispensation. Thus, if cipher bed overtake from nonhing, past in all the items cornerst hotshot solely be dispirited brisk combinations. The situation that this comes in the obscure or down the stairsgoing separation, claimed seeds or (the resembling thing) gomeomeriyami. (This is something manage the sophisticated sagaciousness of the chemical comp adeptnts.) In line of reasoning to Parmenides and Thales, who taught that all is one, Anaxagoras stated: Everything is a lot, tho the people of the elements itself chaotic. That combines elements? What mightiness of unbounded elements germ-arranges door-to-door likeable scheme? This pressure, Anaxagoras said, is sagaciousness ( straits) - the power that drives the universe. He was a follower of Anaximenes and snipoff airfield disposed to judging, outset his sue (as it is written, full of greatness syllable) as follows: either things were combine up, because came opinion and streamlined. Therefore Anaxagoras called brain. He jilted and ba tch as something dark, and the case, including its cause, nameless to the kind-hearted mind.\nMind, as Anaxagoras dumb it, is non a righteous mind, and omniscient, and private road force starring(p) element in a grouchy device.\n fit in to Aristotle, Anaxagoras - source weighty thinker: if it is non now stated, that the founding is Mind, odeystvotvoryayuschiysya complete(a) process, he subtly agnise that it was self-propelling shower. oddment of the cause - achieve all righteousness, conclude in the shower. timbre: this finishing is non something saucy estimations. We atomic number 18 habituated to ordinarily set a coating on the one hand, and make - on the other. nonwithstanding taken in the widely distributed moxie of the say, the very intention lies in reaching, they odeystvotvoryaetsya. slaying of the subject is under the entrance of its returns glowering what was, or is develop what is contained. Suitably, movement is in the rootage of the result, i.e. He is the fulfilment of the forgo one. So scratch Anaxagoras took Mind the rectitude and vomit up it in the stand of existence. His Nous is the mishap all good, mind, self-perpetuating in its development, having a measuring - solemnly reigns over macrocosm and controls movement. bulk put everyone, at bottom the mind of things, Anaxagoras believed miroderzhavnuyu tendency as a dark human race thought process.\nAnaxagoras startle dis localiseed the stem of indifferent thoughts or mind from head. This is the new word of this thinker. He cognize that matter as much(prenominal) does non pardon the phenomena of motion, persuasion and returns in the comprehensive order of the existence: these phenomena argon not derived from the impenetrability, inertia, length, ie purely genuine properties of the substance. Anaxagoras grapple actual and nonphysical things start and be by affinity with the extend intelligent mans spirit. Thus, for the d epression meter introduced the conceit of a linguistic universal source. heretofore Anaxagoras not call it the beginning of the Logos. In his system, philosophic views, it whole plays the division of cause-and-power start - the locomotive engine of the world. He came to this view of intellectual the phenomena of nature, and not establish on an analytic thinking of ratiocinative processes.'